This is my second week
of the class Communication and Collaboration in the Early Childhood Field. My
assignment this week was to watch an episode of a TV show that I do not
normally watch but without sound. During the episode I made predictions about
the characters’ relationships based on how they were communicating. Then I
watched the episode with sound to see in what ways I was and was not correct.
I chose to watch an
episode of “The Millers” which is a show I had never heard of before. The show
started off with two men talking together in a coffee shop and watching a yoga
class that was going on in the next room. One man begins smiling and waving to
a young woman in the yoga class and soon they are waving and making faces at
each other. Soon the class ends and the young woman and an older woman leave
the class talking. The men walk over to them and suddenly the young woman looks
upset at the man she was smiling at and immediately leaves the coffee shop.
As I watched I assumed
that the two men were friends and the man who was smiling at the young woman
was the son of the older woman. It seemed like both of the men were single
because they were focusing on a few different women throughout the episode.
They would flirt with the women by smiling at them from a distance and then
approach the woman and talk very close to them.
During one part of the
episode the mother was at a doctor’s office. She was telling something to the
receptionist and the receptionist looked like she was feeling sorry for the
mother because she had a concerned look on her face and at one point put her
hand on her heart.
After I watched the
episode with sound, I discovered that I was correct about a few things and
incorrect about others. I was correct about the relationships between the
characters. I was able to tell their roles and relationships because of their
nonverbal behaviors including eye contact, facial expressions, proximity to
each other and hand gestures.
If this were a show I
was familiar with I would’ve had some past knowledge about how each of the
characters’ personalities. Watching a new show without sound I made assumptions
that were not always correct. This translates into the real world too because
it’s important to not rely solely on assumptions without sufficient information.
Laura,
ReplyDeleteYou picked a fun show to use for your assignment this week. I had a very similar experience when I watched Frasier. I will say that you were more successful in picking out the relationships of the characters. I also agree with you that when we assume we are not giving our full attention. If we want to have meaningful communication we need to give all of our attention to it.
Jenn Pore`
Laura, My husband and I watch that show all the time and they do use a lot of nonverbal communication to get their point across to each other.
ReplyDeleteGreat post Laura,
ReplyDeleteI have never had a chance to watch this show. My sister-in- law watches it all the time and tells me how funny this show is. From this experience, I have learned that when we assume things based off someone's body language, gestures, etc., we may me assuming the wrong things. Non-verbal communication can be a powerful form of communication.
I haven't seen the show either but have seen the previews seemed pretty funny. I have noticed that many shows have great use of non-verbal communication...I wonder if that is written into the script or if it just comes naturally because they are really getting into character and they are very expressive communicators...sometimes I love that television can be our homework!
ReplyDeleteLaura,
ReplyDeleteGreat Post! I love that show and it took me a second to get into it but it is hugely successful because of the relationships created and the non verbal communication between characters. Glad you enjoyed the assignment.
Megan
Hi Laura
ReplyDeleteLike you I make some rather accurate assumptions and some wrong ones as well. I believe that our able to derive meaning from nonverbal behavior is most times dependent on our schemas and believe like O'Hair and Wiemann stated at times we need to look past these schemas to be able to arrive at the correct assumptions.
Thanks for sharing